From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Farley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 23, 2024
CV 21-3571-AH (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2024)

Opinion

CV 21-3571-AH (JPR)

12-23-2024

JOSHUA ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. R. FARLEY et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

HON. ANNE HWANG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, Defendants' motion for summary judgment and the related opposition papers, the other records on file herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT

1. Any claims against Defendant Villanueva are dismissed.

2. The motion for summary judgment is denied as to Defendants Farley and Wolf for any actions occurring after Plaintiff was on the ground and granted otherwise.

3. The motion for summary judgment is granted as to Defendant Ugalde.

4. The reference to the Magistrate Judge is vacated.

5. The clerk serve this Order on all counsel or parties of record.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Farley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 23, 2024
CV 21-3571-AH (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Rogers v. Farley

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. R. FARLEY et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 23, 2024

Citations

CV 21-3571-AH (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2024)