From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Corbin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1994
204 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 23, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the facts and as an exercise of discretion, with costs, and a new trial is granted on the issue of damages only, unless within 20 days after service upon the plaintiff of a copy of this decision and order with notice of entry, the plaintiff shall serve and file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, a written stipulation consenting to decrease the verdict as to damages from the principal sum of $471,600 to the principal sum of $375,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly. In the event the plaintiff so stipulates, then the judgment, as so decreased and amended, is affirmed, with costs to the defendant payable by the plaintiff.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the plaintiff adduced sufficient evidence from which the jury could rationally conclude that her injuries were proximately caused by the defendant's malpractice (see, Chazon v. Parkway Med. Group, 168 A.D.2d 660; Mortensen v. Memorial Hosp., 105 A.D.2d 151).

Furthermore, we are unpersuaded that the trial court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant a last minute continuance (see, Klein v. New York Tel. Co., 155 A.D.2d 644; Balogh v. H.R.B. Caterers, 88 A.D.2d 136).

However, we find that the damage award deviated materially from what would be reasonable compensation to the extent indicated herein. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Corbin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1994
204 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Rogers v. Corbin

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE ROGERS, Respondent, v. EUSTANCE E. CORBIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 233

Citing Cases

Herbert v. Edwards Super Food Stores-Finast

The record indicates that the defendant failed to exercise due diligence in obtaining the testimony on Dr.…