From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 6, 2024
5:23-cv-01022-JWH-RAO (C.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-01022-JWH-RAO

02-06-2024

EDITH ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOHN W. HOLCOMB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), Dkt. No. 14, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) dated December 7, 2023, Dkt. No. 16, and all other records and files herein. The time for filing objections to the Report has passed and no objections have been received. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 6, 2024
5:23-cv-01022-JWH-RAO (C.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Rogers v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

Case Details

Full title:EDITH ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 6, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-01022-JWH-RAO (C.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2024)