From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Clancy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 1, 2016
144 A.D.3d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-01-2016

In re Marcus ROGERS, Petitioner, v. Hon. Margaret L. CLANCY, etc., et al., Respondents.

Marcus Rogers, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michelle R. Lambert of counsel), for Hon. Margaret L. Clancy, respondent. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Shannon Henderson of counsel), for Hon. Darcel D. Clark, respondent.


Marcus Rogers, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michelle R. Lambert of counsel), for Hon. Margaret L. Clancy, respondent.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Shannon Henderson of counsel), for Hon. Darcel D. Clark, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

SWEENY, J.P., ACOSTA, ANDRIAS, MANZANET–DANIELS, WEBBER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Clancy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 1, 2016
144 A.D.3d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Rogers v. Clancy

Case Details

Full title:In re Marcus Rogers, Petitioner, v. Hon. Margaret L. Clancy, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 1, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7134
39 N.Y.S.3d 778