From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. City of Selma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 8, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-586-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Apr. 8, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-586-CG-M

04-08-2016

MICHAEL DONALD ROGERS Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SELMA, et al., Defendants.


FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants, the City of Selma, Chief William Riley, Lieutenant Curtis Muhannad, and Investigator Ray Blanks, and against Plaintiff, Michael Donald Rogers. It is, therefore, ORDERD that the Plaintiff's claims against Defendants, the City of Selma, Chief William Riley, Lieutenant Curtis Muhannad, and Investigator Ray Blanks, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are to be taxed against the Plaintiff.

DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of April, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rogers v. City of Selma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 8, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-586-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Apr. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Rogers v. City of Selma

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DONALD ROGERS Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SELMA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 8, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-586-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Apr. 8, 2016)