From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Brinkley

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 29, 2007
231 F. App'x 280 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-6477.

Submitted: June 21, 2007.

Decided: June 29, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (8:06-cv-01278-MBS).

Hayward Leon Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Roy F. Laney, Nikole Deanna Haltiwanger, Thomas Lowndes Pope, Riley, Pope Laney, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Hayward Leon Rogers appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Rogers' motion to remand the case and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rogers v. Brinkley, No. 8:06-cv-01278-MBS, 2007 WL 789929 (D.S.C. Mar.14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Brinkley

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 29, 2007
231 F. App'x 280 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Rogers v. Brinkley

Case Details

Full title:Hayward Leon ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant John BRINKLEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 29, 2007

Citations

231 F. App'x 280 (4th Cir. 2007)