From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 26, 2005
CV F 02 5713 OWW WMW P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2005)

Opinion

CV F 02 5713 OWW WMW P.

October 26, 2005


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se. On May 10, 2005, an order was entered, dismissing the operative complaint for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint to correct the identified deficiencies. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, and the court recommended that this action be dismissed for his failure to do so. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In his objections, plaintiff states that he did not receive the May 10, 2005, order dismissing the complaint.

On July 7, 2005, an order was entered, vacating the recommendation of dismissal and directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint that addressed the deficiencies identified in the earlier order dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff has failed to do so within the time allotted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives all objections to the judge's findings of fact. See Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 26, 2005
CV F 02 5713 OWW WMW P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2005)
Case details for

Rogers v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL DWAYNE ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. DERRAL ADAMS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 26, 2005

Citations

CV F 02 5713 OWW WMW P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2005)