From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers, Somers v. Shaughness

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1927
222 App. Div. 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

December, 1927


Judgment for plaintiffs on agreed statement of facts, pursuant to stipulation without costs, upon the ground that Elizabeth Foley was presumed to have died without heirs before the death of Edward Foley in November, 1912; that Edward Foley is presumed to have died without heirs in November, 1912, after the death of Elizabeth Foley; that Catherine Foley acquired a good and marketable title by reason of the failure of heirs of Elizabeth Foley and Edward Foley and by reason of the release of escheat under chapter 733 of the Laws of 1926; and as successors to the rights of Catherine Foley, the plaintiffs Elsie B. Rogers and Marion A. Somers, as sellers herein, can give to defendant a good and marketable title to the real property described in the contract of sale. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rogers, Somers v. Shaughness

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1927
222 App. Div. 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Rogers, Somers v. Shaughness

Case Details

Full title:ELSIE B. ROGERS and MARION A. SOMERS, Plaintiffs, v. STELLA M. SHAUGHNESS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1927

Citations

222 App. Div. 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)