From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogal v. Randall

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 9, 2009
293 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2009)

Opinion

Decided September 9, 2009


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn. App. 89 (AC 29572), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Whether the Appellate Court properly determined that the trial court properly supplied purported missing terms to a restrictive covenant in the subject employment agreement without resorting to the equitable remedy of reformation?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18444.

Scott S. Centrella, in support of the petition.

Sheila A. Huddleston, Glenn M. Cunningham and Lee A. Duval, in opposition.

ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Rogal v. Randall

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 9, 2009
293 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2009)
Case details for

Rogal v. Randall

Case Details

Full title:HILB ROGAL AND HOBBS COMPANY ET AL. v. UTA PETERS RANDALL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 9, 2009

Citations

293 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2009)