From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roff v. Trump Castle Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 1997
243 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 27, 1997

Appeals from Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendant made out a prima facie case for summary judgment. The plaintiff's mere speculation as to what she may have stepped on, causing her to fall, is insufficient to defeat the defendant's motion ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 567, 562; Bavaro v. Martel, 197 A.D.2d 813; Morowitz v. Naughton, 150 A.D.2d 536).

Miller, J.P., Pizzuto, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roff v. Trump Castle Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 1997
243 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Roff v. Trump Castle Associates

Case Details

Full title:JOAN ROFF et al., Respondents, v. TRUMP CASTLE ASSOCIATES T/A TRUMP CASTLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 27, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 309

Citing Cases

Sessa v. Motown Cafe, LLC

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed…

Frustace v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

The Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In…