From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roessle v. Roessle

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 5, 1918
119 N.E. 1075 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued February 15, 1918

Decided March 5, 1918

Marcus T. Hun for Marion L. McKinney, appellant.

John Ewen for Elwood O. Roessle, appellant.

Joseph H. Choate, Jr., for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, HOGAN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: POUND, J. Not sitting: McLAUGHLIN, J.


Summaries of

Roessle v. Roessle

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 5, 1918
119 N.E. 1075 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Roessle v. Roessle

Case Details

Full title:NELLY T. ROESSLE, Respondent, v . ELWOOD O. ROESSLE et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 5, 1918

Citations

119 N.E. 1075 (N.Y. 1918)
119 N.E. 1075

Citing Cases

Matter of Rehill

The equal division of the fee did not interfere with the scheme of the testator as disclosed by the will.…

Loria, Inc. v. Stanton Co.

While, of course, in this action it cannot be determined that Mrs. Carroll is entitled to dower, it is clear…