From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roemer v. Capistrant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 18, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02567-RPM-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02567-RPM-BNB

10-18-2011

PIERRE D. ROEMER, Plaintiff, v. FLOYD CAPISTRANT, a Police Officer with the Pagosa Springs, Colorado Police Department, in his Professional and Individual Capacities, JOHN MARTIN, a Former Police Officer of the Pagosa Springs, Colorado Police Department, and Current Deputy with the Archuleta County Sheriff Department, in his Individual and Professional Capacities, WILLIAM ROCKENSOCK, Former Sergeant and Current Police Chief of Pagosa Springs, Colorado Police Department, in his Professional Capacity, JOHN DOE, Employee and Supervisor with the Pagosa Springs, Colorado Police Department, in his/her Individual and Professional Capacities, and SCOTT MAXWELL, Employee and Supervisory Detective with the Pagosa Springs Police Department, in his Individual and Professional Capacities, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the affidavit in support of the motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees or security pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Court has granted the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. It now is

ORDERED that, if appropriate, the Clerk shall attempt to obtain a waiver of service from the defendants. If unable to do so, the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint, summons, order granting leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and all other orders upon the defendants. If appropriate, the Marshal shall first attempt to obtain a waiver of service of these documents pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants or counsel for the defendants shall respond to the complaint as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure after service of process on the defendants.

BY THE COURT:

Richard P. Matsch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Roemer v. Capistrant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 18, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02567-RPM-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Roemer v. Capistrant

Case Details

Full title:PIERRE D. ROEMER, Plaintiff, v. FLOYD CAPISTRANT, a Police Officer with…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02567-RPM-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2011)