Opinion
CA 05-00715.
Decided September 30, 2005.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (James R. Harvey, A.J.), entered October 1, 2004. The order denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) and denied defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.
TREVETT, LENWEAVER SALZER, P.C., ROCHESTER (JAMES C. GOCKER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
HISCOCK BARCLAY, LLP, ROCHESTER (ROBERT M. SHADDOCK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT MICHAEL K. BASKIN.
Before: PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, KEHOE, MARTOCHE, AND LAWTON, JJ.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.