From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roeder v. Collection Bureau of the Hudson Valley, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 6, 2022
20 Civ. 6200 (JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 6, 2022)

Opinion

20 Civ. 6200 (JCM)

06-06-2022

ADAM ROEDER, Plaintiff, v. COLLECTION BUREAU OF THE HUDSON VALLEY, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

JUDITH C. McCARTHY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On June 2, 2022, the parties informed the Court that have reached a settlement in the above-captioned matter. (Docket No. 41). Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED, that this action be and hereby is discontinued with prejudice but without costs to any party; provided, however, that if settlement is not consummated within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, plaintiff may apply by letter within the sixty-day period for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within sixty (60) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis.

The parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within sixty (60) days with a request that the agreement be “So Ordered” by the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roeder v. Collection Bureau of the Hudson Valley, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 6, 2022
20 Civ. 6200 (JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Roeder v. Collection Bureau of the Hudson Valley, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ADAM ROEDER, Plaintiff, v. COLLECTION BUREAU OF THE HUDSON VALLEY, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 6, 2022

Citations

20 Civ. 6200 (JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 6, 2022)