Opinion
2200354
05-06-2022
Ashley Smith Roe v. William Davis Roe
Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit Court (DR-18-900053)
HANSON, JUDGE.
AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(C), Ala. R. App. P.; Ala. Code 1975, §§ 12-3-16 & 30-3-152(a); Ex parte Bland, 796 So.2d 340, 344 (Ala. 2000); Ex parte R.C.L., 627 So.2d 920, 922 (Ala. 1993); Anonymous v. Anonymous, 277 Ala. 634, 637-38, 173 So.2d 797, 800 (1965); S.L. v. J.L.C., 282 So.3d 26, 35 (Ala. Civ. App. 2019); Cooper v. Cooper, 160 So.3d 1232, 1243-44 (Ala. Civ. App. 2014); Ex parte A.J., 108 So.3d 1040, 1044 n.5 (Ala. Civ. App. 2012); Henning v. Henning, 26 So.3d 450, 455 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009); Smith v. Smith, 887 So.2d 257, 262 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003); A.L. v. S.J., 827 So.2d 828, 836 (Ala. Civ. App. 2002); B.J.N. v. P.D., 742 So.2d 1270, 1273-74 (Ala. Civ. App. 1999); Phillips v. Phillips, 622 So.2d 410, 412 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993); and Sims v. Sims, 515 So.2d 1, 2-3 (Ala. Civ. App. 1987).
The appellant's request for an award of attorneys' fees on appeal is denied. The appellee's request for an award of attorneys' fees on appeal is granted in the amount of $4,000.
Thompson, P.J., and Moore and Fridy, JJ., concur.
Edwards, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion.
EDWARDS, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in that part of the no-opinion order affirming the judgment entered by the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court. I dissent from that part of the order granting the appellee's request for an award of attorney's fees on appeal.