From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roe v. Rivian Auto., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 10, 2021
CASE NO. 8:20-cv-00998-MWF ADS (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2021)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:20-cv-00998-MWF ADS

03-10-2021

JOHN ROE, JANE ROE AND JOHN ROE II, Plaintiffs and Punitive Class Representatives, v. RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's December 12, 2020 Order Granting Defendant Rivian Automotive, LLC's ("Rivian") Motion For Sanctions (Doc. 26), as well as the Court's February 11, 2021 Order Apportioning Sanctions (Doc. 28), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

1. Rivian shall have judgment in its favor against Plaintiffs' counsel Timothy M. Cojocnean in the amount of $67,221.92;

2. Rivian shall have judgment in its favor against Plaintiff Keenan Moody in the amount of $8,402.74; and

3. Rivian shall have judgment in its favor against Plaintiff Sara Karp in the amount of $8,402.74.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 10, 2021

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Roe v. Rivian Auto., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 10, 2021
CASE NO. 8:20-cv-00998-MWF ADS (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Roe v. Rivian Auto., LLC

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ROE, JANE ROE AND JOHN ROE II, Plaintiffs and Punitive Class…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 10, 2021

Citations

CASE NO. 8:20-cv-00998-MWF ADS (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2021)