From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roe v. Rialto Unified School District

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 28, 2021
5:19-cv-863-JGB (SP) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2021)

Opinion

5:19-cv-863-JGB (SP)

10-28-2021

JANE ROE, Plaintiff, v. RIALTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants.

Maria A. Aarvig (SBN 146671), Michael Reiter (SBN 197768), AARVIG & ASSOCIATES, APC, Attorneys for Defendants, RIALTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, TODD HARRIS and, CAROLINE SWEENEY.


Maria A. Aarvig (SBN 146671), Michael Reiter (SBN 197768), AARVIG & ASSOCIATES, APC, Attorneys for Defendants, RIALTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, TODD HARRIS and, CAROLINE SWEENEY.

JUDGMENT

JESUS G. HERNAL, DISTRICT JUDGE.

The above-captioned case was tried by a jury with the Honorable Judge Jesus G. Bernal presiding, and the jury rendered a verdict on September 30, 2021. The verdict is that the plaintiff recovers nothing. Defendants RIALTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, TODD HARRIS, and CAROLINE SWEENEY are the prevailing parties and may recover costs. Judgment is hereby pronounced for defendants RIALTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, TODD HARRIS, and CAROLINE SWEENEY against plaintiff Samiyah Dickerson.

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED. AND DECREE. 1


Summaries of

Roe v. Rialto Unified School District

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 28, 2021
5:19-cv-863-JGB (SP) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Roe v. Rialto Unified School District

Case Details

Full title:JANE ROE, Plaintiff, v. RIALTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 28, 2021

Citations

5:19-cv-863-JGB (SP) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2021)