From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ROE v. OVERSTOCK.COM INC

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Mar 19, 2009
Case No. 2:09CV7TC (D. Utah Mar. 19, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09CV7TC.

March 19, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The court referred this case to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On March 3, 2009, Judge Wells, in a very thorough Report and Recommendation, recommended that this case be DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. 1915 and that Plaintiff's motions for service of process be DENIED.

The parties were given ten days to file objections to the Report and Recommendation and were cautioned that failure to file an objection could constitute waiver thereof upon subsequent review. Plaintiff filed an objection on March 11, 3009. Plaintiff's objection does nothing to cure the infirmities of the complaint.

(Dkt. 11)

The court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation in this matter and relevant materials in the file and agrees with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the order of the court. Plaintiff's complaint is frivolous and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's motions for service of process are DENIED.

(Dkt. 10)

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

ROE v. OVERSTOCK.COM INC

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Mar 19, 2009
Case No. 2:09CV7TC (D. Utah Mar. 19, 2009)
Case details for

ROE v. OVERSTOCK.COM INC

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN M. ROE, Plaintiff, v. OVERSTOCK.COM INC., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: Mar 19, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:09CV7TC (D. Utah Mar. 19, 2009)