From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roe v. Chandler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Feb 13, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO.4:13-CV-721-O (N.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.4:13-CV-721-O

02-13-2014

NICHOLAS LEE ROE, Petitioner, v. RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden, FCI-Fort Worth, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Nicholas Lee Roe under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the Court has made an independent review of the following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;
2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on January 24, 2014; and
3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on February 7, 2014.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that the Petitioner's objections must be overruled, and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should be denied, for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions, and for the reasons stated in the respondent's November 18, 2013 response at pages 3-7.

Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Nicholas Lee Roe's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED.

__________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Roe v. Chandler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Feb 13, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO.4:13-CV-721-O (N.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Roe v. Chandler

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS LEE ROE, Petitioner, v. RODNEY W. CHANDLER, Warden, FCI-Fort…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Feb 13, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.4:13-CV-721-O (N.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2014)