From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roe v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 7, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-00321-HSO-RHW (S.D. Miss. Sep. 7, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-00321-HSO-RHW

09-07-2012

BARRY A. ROE PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT


FINAL JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on submission of the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [13] of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker, entered in this cause on August 13, 2012. The Court, by separate Order entered this date, adopted said Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [13] as the finding of this Court and denied the Commissioner's Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) [10]. The Court found that this matter should be remanded to the ALJ for his consideration of the consultative exam and report of Dr. Charlton Barnes. Accordingly,

IT IS, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, this action is remanded to the ALJ for his reconsideration in light of the consultative exam and report of Dr. Charlton Barnes.

______________________

HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Roe v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 7, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-00321-HSO-RHW (S.D. Miss. Sep. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Roe v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BARRY A. ROE PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 7, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-00321-HSO-RHW (S.D. Miss. Sep. 7, 2012)