From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roe Bros. v. Adam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1985
114 A.D.2d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

November 25, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Palella, J.).


Order affirmed, with costs.

A court is authorized to vacate a default judgment pursuant to the provisions of CPLR 5015 upon a showing of an excusable default and a meritorious defense. In the case at bar, prior to his death the defendant's decedent explained that his default was the result of an inadvertent mistake, and he offered evidence in support of his claim that he had a meritorious defense. Accordingly, recognizing the strong public policy in favor of resolving cases on their merits, it was not an abuse of discretion for Special Term to have granted the motion (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Anolick v Travelers Ins. Co., 63 A.D.2d 665, 666). O'Connor, J.P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roe Bros. v. Adam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1985
114 A.D.2d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Roe Bros. v. Adam

Case Details

Full title:ROE BROS., INC., Appellant, v. MARIA ADAM, as Administratrix of the Estate…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 25, 1985

Citations

114 A.D.2d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of Pingpank

While the appellant's excuse for his failure to appear on the return date of the citation amounts to nothing…