From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriquez v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 27, 2012
2:10cv1383 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 27, 2012)

Opinion

2:10cv1383

09-27-2012

HERIBERTO RODRIQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. UNIT MANAGER WALKER, et al., Defendants.


Electronic Filing


Judge Cercone

Magistrate Judge Eddy


MEMORANDUM ORDER

The above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) on October 20, 2010, and was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the local rules of court.

On August 16, 2012, Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy filed a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 48) recommending that Defendants* Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28) be granted. Plaintiff was served with the Report and Recommendation at his listed address and was advised that he had until September 4, 2012, to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. On August 22, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Motion for an Extension of Time to file objections (ECF No. 49), which the Court granted giving him until September 14, 2012, to file his objections. No objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in this case, together with the Report and Recommendation the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2012,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 48) dated August 16, 2012, is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

____________________

David Stewart Cercone

United States District Judge
cc: Heriberto Rodriquez

FW1620

SCI Pittsburgh

P. O. Box 9991

Pittsburgh, PA 15233

(Via First Class Mail)

Mary Lynch Friedline, Esquire

(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)


Summaries of

Rodriquez v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 27, 2012
2:10cv1383 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Rodriquez v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:HERIBERTO RODRIQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. UNIT MANAGER WALKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 27, 2012

Citations

2:10cv1383 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 27, 2012)