From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Wal-Mart Assocs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 20, 2024
5:24-cv-01998-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2024)

Opinion

5:24-cv-01998-SSS-DTBx

11-20-2024

Isabel Rodriguez v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., et al.


Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES- GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DOE DEFENDANTS

On June 26, 2024, Plaintiff Isabel Rodriguez filed her Complaint in which numerous Doe defendants are listed. [See Dkt. 1-2, Complaint]. As of the date of this order, there is no evidence in the record to show Plaintiff has timely served these defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Doe defendants should not be dismissed for failure to name and serve a copy of the summons and Complaint on these defendants. Plaintiff must respond in writing by December 20, 2024. Failure to respond will result in a dismissal of the Doe defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to obey court orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Wal-Mart Assocs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 20, 2024
5:24-cv-01998-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Wal-Mart Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:Isabel Rodriguez v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 20, 2024

Citations

5:24-cv-01998-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2024)