Rodriguez v. Teletrack

Full title: LETICIA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. CORELOGIC TELETRACK, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 23, 2022

2:21-cv-02182-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02182-APG-BNW

11-23-2022

LETICIA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. CORELOGIC TELETRACK, Defendant.

Law Offices of Miles N. Clark, LLC Clark Hill Miles N. Clark, Esq. Gia Marina, Esq. Krieger Law Group, LLC David H. Krieger, Esq.

HON. ANDREW P. GORDON, JUDGE

Law Offices of Miles N. Clark, LLC

Clark Hill

Miles N. Clark, Esq.

Gia Marina, Esq.

Krieger Law Group, LLC

David H. Krieger, Esq.

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF CORELOGIC TELETRACK, WITH PREJUDICE

HON. ANDREW P. GORDON, JUDGE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Leticia Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Corelogic Teletrack, (“Corelogic”) hereby stipulate and agree that the above-entitled action shall be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii).

There are no longer any issues in this matter between Leticia Rodriguez and Corelogic to be determined by this Court. Plaintiff and Corelogic hereby stipulate that all claims and causes of action that were or could have been asserted against Corelogic are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with court costs to be paid by the party incurring same.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CORELOGIC TELETRACK, WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS SO ORDERED.