From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Steck

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 9, 2016
Case No. CV 15-2287-VAP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-2287-VAP (JEM)

02-09-2016

GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. J. STECK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. DATED: February 9, 2016

/s/_________

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Steck

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 9, 2016
Case No. CV 15-2287-VAP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2016)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Steck

Case Details

Full title:GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. J. STECK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 9, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 15-2287-VAP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2016)