From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Mar 28, 2024
No. 05-23-00137-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 28, 2024)

Opinion

05-23-00137-CR 05-23-00185-CR

03-28-2024

CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 366-83557-2016, 366-83556-2016

ORDER

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS PRESIDING JUSTICE

Before the Court is appellant's pro se motions to dismiss the appeals. The motions are signed by appellant, but the motions are not signed by appellant's appointed attorney, who has filed in each case a motion to withdraw from representing appellant pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) requires, "The appellant and his or her attorney must sign the motion to dismiss . . . ." Tex.R.App.P. 42.2(a). Accordingly, appellant's pro se motions to dismiss the appeals are DENIED because the motions are not signed by appellant and his attorney. The denial of the motions is without prejudice to the filing of motions to dismiss the appeals that are signed by both appellant and his attorney as required by Rule 42.2(a).


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Mar 28, 2024
No. 05-23-00137-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Mar 28, 2024

Citations

No. 05-23-00137-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 28, 2024)