From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 3, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1489 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1489 MCE GGH P.

February 3, 2006


ORDER


By order filed August 24, 2005, petitioner's petition was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended petition was granted. The thirty day period expired and petitioner did not filed an amended petition. Accordingly, on January 19, 2006, the court recommended that this action be dismissed.

On January 24, 2006, petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Petitioner states that he did file the amended petition but the Clerk's Office misplaced it. The court has no record of petitioner's amended petition. Nevertheless, the court will vacate the findings and recommendations and grant petitioner one final opportunity to file his amended petition.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The January 19, 2006, findings and recommendations are vacated;

2. Petitioner is granted twenty days from the date of this order to file an amended petition; failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 3, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1489 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSE DeJESUS RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 3, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1489 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2006)