From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 17, 2017
212 So. 3d 1148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 5D16–1696

03-17-2017

Ivan RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nicole Joanne Martingano, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nicole Joanne Martingano, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED without prejudice to file a timely, facially sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 17, 2017
212 So. 3d 1148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ivan RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Mar 17, 2017

Citations

212 So. 3d 1148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)