From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Dec 4, 2014
NUMBER 13-14-00394-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 4, 2014)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00394-CR

12-04-2014

ARTURO MILITON RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On appeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Counsel for appellant filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. In a signed attachment, appellant states that he wishes to dismiss his appeal. We find the motion and attachment together meet the requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and his attorney must sign a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 4th day of December, 2014.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Dec 4, 2014
NUMBER 13-14-00394-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARTURO MILITON RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Dec 4, 2014

Citations

NUMBER 13-14-00394-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 4, 2014)