From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jul 1, 2008
257 S.W.3d 186 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. WD 67914.

July 1, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Johnson County, Joseph Paul Dandurand, Judge.

Susan Lynn Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Shaun Mackelprang and Jaime Wilson Corman, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge, HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge, and THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judge.


ORDER


Juan Antonio Rodriguez ("Rodriguez") appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. In his sole point on appeal, Rodriguez claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request that a self-defense instruction be submitted to the jury during his trial for murder and armed criminal action. Having reviewed the record on appeal, we find no error. As a full written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court and the judgment of the motion court is affirmed pursuant to rule 84.16(b).

All rules cited are Missouri Rules of Court (2006) unless otherwise noted.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jul 1, 2008
257 S.W.3d 186 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Juan Antonio RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Jul 1, 2008

Citations

257 S.W.3d 186 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)