From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 21, 1989
539 So. 2d 612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1939.

March 21, 1989.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County; Arthur I. Snyder, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ralph Barreira, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.


Upon the state's concession that Del Sol v. State, 537 So.2d 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), requires a reversal and remand for a new trial, we reverse the final judgments of conviction and sentences under review and remand the cause to the trial court for a new trial based on the authority of Del Sol, as well as Hernandez v. State, 538 So.2d 521 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), which follows Del Sol.

We recognize that the state does not agree with Del Sol and Hernandez and may wish to pursue further appellate review in this case. To facilitate such review, we certify that our decision in this case conflicts with Kibler v. State, 501 So.2d 76 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 21, 1989
539 So. 2d 612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:JULIO RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 21, 1989

Citations

539 So. 2d 612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Moriyon v. State

This court, however, has held repeatedly that "[a] defendant, whatever his race, has standing to challenge…