From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 7, 2000
767 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 2000)

Opinion

No. SC96794

September 7, 2000

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict.

Second District — Case No. 2D98-02185.

(Collier County).

Neil D. Kolner of the Law Office of Michael D. Ray, Miami, Florida, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Chief of Criminal Law, Tampa Bureau, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Respondent.


We have for review Rodriguez v. State, 742 So.2d 422 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), which is a per curiam decision without opinion citing only to Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998),quashed, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla. 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla. 1981).

This Court recently held in Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla. 2000), that a defendant may seek postconviction relief based on a claim that he or she was not advised of the immigration consequences of a plea. We emphasize that all such claims filed subsequent to our decision in Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla. 1999), must be filed pursuant to a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Peart, 756 So.2d at 45. Rodriguez is quashed as being inconsistent with our decision in Peart.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

WELLS, C.J., and HARDING and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 7, 2000
767 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 2000)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 7, 2000

Citations

767 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 2000)