From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Stanfield

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Apr 17, 2019
273 So. 3d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 3D19-117

04-17-2019

Milagros RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. Griselda STANFIELD, Appellee.

Milagros Rodriguez, in proper person. Walter J. Harvey, School Board Attorney, and Jeff James, Assistant School Board Attorney, for appellee.


Milagros Rodriguez, in proper person.

Walter J. Harvey, School Board Attorney, and Jeff James, Assistant School Board Attorney, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Upon our review of the record and the initial brief, we affirm on the authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) (providing: "After service of the initial brief ..., the court may summarily affirm the order to be reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated.")


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Stanfield

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Apr 17, 2019
273 So. 3d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Stanfield

Case Details

Full title:Milagros Rodriguez, Appellant, v. Griselda Stanfield, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Apr 17, 2019

Citations

273 So. 3d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)