From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Stall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 12, 2015
Civil No. 14cv2646 LAB (DHB) (S.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No. 14cv2646 LAB (DHB)

01-12-2015

PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, Inmate Booking No. 14745493, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT S. STALL; LAURA ENGREM; F. MICHAEL GARCIA; OFFICE OF ASSIGNED COUNSEL, Defendant.


ORDER:

(1) DENYING MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND

(2) GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Pedro Rodriguez ("Plaintiff"), currently housed at the Vista Detention Facility located in Vista, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint ("Compl.") pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. No. 1).

Plaintiff has not prepaid the civil filing fee; instead he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (Doc. No. 3). On November 26, 2014, this Court granted Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP but sua sponte dismissed his Complaint for failing to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

Instead of filing a First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff has filed a "Motion to Amend Complaint" in which he seeks to add two additional Defendants. (Doc No. 7.) In this Motion, Plaintiff indicates that he is seeking to "add" to his original Complaint. However, Plaintiff's Complaint has been dismissed and there currently is no operative pleading in this matter. Plaintiff has been given leave to file an Amended Complaint and he may choose to add these additional Defendants to that pleading.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend his Complaint (Doc. No. 7) is DENIED.

2. Plaintiff is GRANTED sixty (60) days leave from the date of this Order in which to file an Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading noted in the Court's November 26, 2014 Order. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint must be complete in itself without reference to his original pleading. See S.D. CAL. CIVLR. 15.1. Defendants not named and all claims not re-alleged in the Amended Complaint will be considered waived. See King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of a form § 1983 complaint. DATED: January 12, 2015

/s/_________

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Stall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 12, 2015
Civil No. 14cv2646 LAB (DHB) (S.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Stall

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, Inmate Booking No. 14745493, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT S…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 12, 2015

Citations

Civil No. 14cv2646 LAB (DHB) (S.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2015)