From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Shireman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Mar 28, 2016
646 F. App'x 812 (11th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-12271

03-28-2016

OSCAR RODRIGUEZ, LIZABETH RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DETECTIVE MARK SHIREMAN, in his individual and official capacity, Defendant-Appellee.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 2:13-cv-14453-JEM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Before WILSON, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Detective Mark Shireman arrested Oscar and Lizabeth Rodriguez on charges of dealing in stolen property, in violation of Florida Statutes § 812.019. However, the state attorney ultimately dropped the charges. Thereafter, the Rodriguezes filed a complaint in district court raising 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state malicious prosecution claims against Shireman. The Rodriguezes asserted that Shireman violated their Fourth Amendment rights and engaged in malicious prosecution because he arrested them without probable cause. The district court granted summary judgment to Shireman on all of the Rodriguezes' claims. This appeal followed.

After careful consideration of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm substantially for reasons given by the opinion of the district court. See Rodriguez v. Shireman, No. 2:13-cv-14453-JEM (S.D. Fla. May 13, 2015).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Shireman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Mar 28, 2016
646 F. App'x 812 (11th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Shireman

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR RODRIGUEZ, LIZABETH RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DETECTIVE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 28, 2016

Citations

646 F. App'x 812 (11th Cir. 2016)