holding that evidence presented at trial clearly justified the trial court's accomplice liability instruction and did not cause defendant prejudice or unfair surprise, even though details of accomplice liability were not disclosed in bill of particulars
Summary of this case from Zimmerman v. StateNo. 86-6233.
April 20, 1987, October TERM, 1986.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 796 F. 2d 930.
holding that evidence presented at trial clearly justified the trial court's accomplice liability instruction and did not cause defendant prejudice or unfair surprise, even though details of accomplice liability were not disclosed in bill of particulars
Summary of this case from Zimmerman v. StateFull title:RODRIGUEZ v. SCHWEIGER ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 20, 1987
On this direct appeal from the district court's denial of defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on…
Beets v. Scottconflict and no adverse effect when attorney was "serious" candidate for U.S. Attorney during his…