From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 29, 2021
20 CIVIL 5135 (PGG)(RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2021)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 5135 (PGG)(RWL)

01-29-2021

DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Stipulation and Order dated January 29, 2021, that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security shall be, and hereby is, reversed and that this action shall be, and hereby is, remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. On remand, the Commissioner of Social Security shall ensure that the administrative record includes the January 4, 2017 Internal Medicine Examination report of consultative examiner Dr. Allen Meisel and the January 4, 2017 Psychiatric Evaluation report of consultative examiner Dr. Amy Theobald. Dated: New York, New York

January 29, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 29, 2021
20 CIVIL 5135 (PGG)(RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 29, 2021

Citations

20 CIVIL 5135 (PGG)(RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2021)