From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RODRIGUEZ v. RUPF

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 3, 2008
No. C 06-5410 MHP (N.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2008)

Opinion

No. C 06-5410 MHP.

March 3, 2008


ORDER (Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)


The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.


Summaries of

RODRIGUEZ v. RUPF

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 3, 2008
No. C 06-5410 MHP (N.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2008)
Case details for

RODRIGUEZ v. RUPF

Case Details

Full title:MARIA PATRISIA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff(s), v. WARREN RUPF et al, Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Mar 3, 2008

Citations

No. C 06-5410 MHP (N.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2008)