From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Jan 14, 2014
2014 CW 0036 (La. Ct. App. Jan. 14, 2014)

Opinion

2014 CW 0036

01-14-2014

CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, JR v. TRICIA FRANK RODRIGUEZ


In Re: Tricia Frank Rodriguez, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 2013-10562. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., WELCH ANDCRAIN, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator has failed to comply with Rules 4-2 and 4-3, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, in that the application does not contain a copy of the notice of intent showing the filing date and a signed copy of the return date order setting the date fixed by the trial court for filing the application with this Court.

Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application for rehearing will not be considered. Rules 4-9 and 2-18.7, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.

In the event relator seeks to file a new application with this Court, it must contain all pertinent documentation, including documentation showing the original application was timely filed, and must comply with Rules 2-12.2, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. Any new application must be filed on or before January 21, 2014, and must contain a copy of this ruling.

VGW

JEW

WJC

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

__________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Jan 14, 2014
2014 CW 0036 (La. Ct. App. Jan. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, JR v. TRICIA FRANK RODRIGUEZ

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 14, 2014

Citations

2014 CW 0036 (La. Ct. App. Jan. 14, 2014)