From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 22, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

522345

09-22-2016

In the Matter of NALDY RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Naldy Rodriguez, Cape Vincent, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Before: Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

Naldy Rodriguez, Cape Vincent, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a prison disciplinary determination. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto expunged from petitioner's institutional record and petitioner's inmate account was never charged the $5 mandatory surcharge. In view of this, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and the appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Makas v Venettozzi, 138 AD3d 1342, 1342-1343 [2016]; Matter of Rizzuto v Prack, 137 AD3d 1381, 1382 [2016]). As the record discloses that petitioner was assessed a $15 reduced filing fee, he is entitled to a refund of that amount (see Matter of Clark v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 138 AD3d 1331, 1332 [2016]).

Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 22, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Prack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NALDY RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. ALBERT PRACK, as Director…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 22, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 1235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6128
37 N.Y.S.3d 722

Citing Cases

White v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed,…

Cendales v. Sheahan

Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed…