From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Pfeiffer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 17, 2021
1:21-cv-00572-NE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00572-NE-EPG (PC)

11-17-2021

MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER (ECF NO. 21)

Plaintiff Manuel Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”), proceeding through counsel, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 5, 2021. (ECF No. 1.)

On November 15, 2021, after Plaintiff failed to file his First Amended Complaint by the applicable deadline, the Court entered an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. (ECF No. 21.) Plaintiff was directed to file either a written response or an amended complaint within fourteen days. (Id.) On November 16, 2021, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 22.)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's order (ECF No. 21) requiring Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order is DISCHARGED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Pfeiffer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 17, 2021
1:21-cv-00572-NE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Pfeiffer

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00572-NE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2021)