Opinion
6:23-cv-1365-JRK
03-28-2024
MARIA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,[1] Defendant.
ORDER
JAMES R. KLINDT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs Consent Motion for Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C.A. § 2412(d) (Doc. No. 38; “Motion”), filed February 14, 2024. In the Motion, Plaintiffs counsel seeks an award of attorney's fees pursuant to the EAJA in the amount of $7,196.53. Motion at 1, 2, 5. Plaintiff represents that Defendant does not oppose the relief requested. Id. at 1, 5.
Plaintiffs counsel indicates a total of 29.5 hours were expended in the representation of Plaintiff before the Court. Id. at 1, 2. Plaintiff requests an hourly rate of $243.95. Id. at 1, 2. Plaintiff is seeking a higher hourly rate than the $125 specified by statute based on the increase in the cost of living since 1996, when the attorney's fee rate was last adjusted by Congress. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A) (permitting fee awards at rates higher than $125 per hour upon the Court's determination that cost of living has increased). Having examined the Consumer Price Index and the representations made in the Motion, the Court concludes an increase in inflation does justify a proportionate increase in attorney's fees.
See U.S. Dep't of Labor, Inflation Calculator, http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl (last visited March 27, 2024). In computing the hourly rate adjustment for the cost of living increase, the Consumer Price Index is generally used for the year in which the services were performed. See Masonry Masters, Inc. v. Nelson, 105 F.3d 708, 710-13 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see also Gates v. Barnhart, No. 5:01-cv-148-GRJ, 2002 WL 1452232, at *3 (M.D. Fla. June 25, 2002) (unpublished).
Plaintiff has assigned her rights to any entitlement of attorney's fees due under the EAJA to her counsel. See Motion at 5, Ex. 1 (Plaintiff's Affidavit and Assignment of Fee). Regarding the assignment, Plaintiff represents the following:
[F]ollowing an order by the Court awarding an EAJA fee to the Plaintiff, Defendant will then, as a courtesy to Plaintiffs attorney, verify whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United States that is subject to offset. If there is no such debt, payment will be made payable to Plaintiffs attorney. Plaintiff does not object to this policy.Id. at 5-6.
In light of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff's Consent Motion for Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2412(d) (Doc. No. 38) is GRANTED.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for attorney's fees in the amount of $7,196.53 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
3. The Commissioner may exercise the discretion to honor Plaintiffs assignment of fees to counsel if the U.S. Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the U.S. Government.