From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. New York City Health and Hosp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 16, 1997
245 A.D.2d 174 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 16, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.).


The gravamen of plaintiff's claim against appellants is that they failed to refer the infant's mother to a physician for an immediate cesarean section on June 19, 1992. On June 22, 1992, however, when defendant Suarez, a physician, examined the mother, she came to the conclusion that a cesarean section was unnecessary. Two other physicians, Bourne and defendant White, examined the mother on June 23, 1992, and reached the same conclusion. In light of the determinations on June 22 and 23, 1992 by three physicians to proceed with a vaginal delivery, there is no basis upon which to conclude that a referral by appellants on June 19, 1992 would have resulted in a different course of action. Accordingly, we find plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the alleged failure was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff's injuries.

The IAS Court erred in denying the motion, made in March 1997, as untimely. The 120 day period for making a summary judgment motion under the amendment of CPLR 3212 (a) in 1996 begins to run from its effective date of January 1, 1997 ( Phoenix Garden Rest. v. Chu, 245 A.D.2d 164 [released herewith].

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Rubin, Williams and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. New York City Health and Hosp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 16, 1997
245 A.D.2d 174 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. New York City Health and Hosp

Case Details

Full title:JONADEL RODRIGUEZ, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, MARIBEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 174 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 179

Citing Cases

Poblocki v. Todoro

We note in particular that the redacted affidavits of plaintiffs experts are both speculative and conclusory…

Montgomery v. City of N.Y.

Filing a motion for summary judgment beyond the statutory time limit renders that motion untimely as a matter…