Opinion
2:21-cv-01407-JCM-BNW
01-28-2022
LETICIA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL CONSUMER TELECOM & UTILITIES EXCHANGE; COX COMMUNICATIONS, Defendants.
David H. Krieger, Esq. Shawn W. Miller, Esq. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael N. Feder, Esq. DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Attorneys for Defendant COX
David H. Krieger, Esq. Shawn W. Miller, Esq. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff
Michael N. Feder, Esq. DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Attorneys for Defendant COX
STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND COX COMMUNICATIONS GRANTING COX COMMUNICATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ON THE BASIS THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS ARE SUBJECT TO ARBITRATION
Leticia Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel, together with Defendant Cox Communication (“Cox”), by and through its counsel, collectively the “Parties”, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Plaintiff filed her Complaint on July 28, 2020 (ECF No. 1).
2. Defendant Cox Communications filed a Motion to Dismiss on November 8, 2020, alleging that the Court lacks jurisdiction due to an arbitration agreement and asserts that Plaintiff must be compelled to arbitrate its claims against Cox due to a valid and enforceable arbitration agreement. (ECF 21).
3. Plaintiffs counsel contacted Cox's counsel advising that Plaintiff will stipulate to arbitration in accordance with the arbitration agreement.
4. As such, Plaintiff and Cox stipulate and agree that Cox's Motion to Dismiss is granted solely on the basis that Plaintiffs claims are subject to arbitration and that Cox should be dismissed, without prejudice, with each Party to bear its own fees and costs incurred in this proceeding.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.