From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Madden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 14, 2022
2:22-cv-1539 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1539 KJN P

10-14-2022

STEVEN REFUGIO RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. MADDEN, Respondent.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Two motions are pending.

On October 7, 2022, petitioner filed a request for the return of his legal property. Petitioner was transferred from RJ Donovan in San Diego to the California Men's Colony State Prison in San Luis Obispo and had not yet received his legal property. However, on October 11, 2022, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address reflecting his recent transfer to the California Rehabilitation Center in Norco, California. In light of plaintiff's recent transfer, plaintiff's motion is denied without prejudice should his legal materials not be delivered to him at Norco.

In his recent filing, plaintiff also moved for an extension of time to pay the required filing fee ($5.00). Good cause appearing, plaintiff's motion is granted. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's request (ECF No. 8) is denied without prejudice;

2. Petitioner's request for an extension of time (ECF No. 9) is granted;

3. Petitioner shall submit the appropriate filing fee within thirty days from the date of this order.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Madden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 14, 2022
2:22-cv-1539 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN REFUGIO RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. MADDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 14, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-1539 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2022)