From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Logan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1992
188 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 14, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The denial of summary judgment before pretrial discovery had even begun was proper, as the motion was premature at that juncture (see, Schleich v Gruber, 133 A.D.2d 224; Smith v City of New York, 133 A.D.2d 818; Blue Bird Coach Lines v 107 Del. Ave., 125 A.D.2d 971). The alleged admission of guilt that the plaintiffs assert the defendant driver signed does not preclude questions of comparative negligence and those relating to whether the accident could have been avoided by the plaintiff driver, matters which may be probed during pretrial discovery. Sullivan, J.P., O'Brien, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Logan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1992
188 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Logan

Case Details

Full title:SARAH RODRIGUEZ et al., Appellants, v. MARY LOGAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Seemer v. Seemer

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court properly found that she had failed to make a prima…

Barletta v. Lewis

We reverse. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, it was premature to grant summary judgment before…