From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jul 27, 2006
No. 09-06-046 CV (Tex. App. Jul. 27, 2006)

Opinion

No. 09-06-046 CV

Opinion Delivered July 27, 2006.

On Appeal from the 58th District Court, Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Cause No. a-163381.

Appeal Dismissed.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On May 18, 2006, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. Appellant did not respond. The appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex.R.App.P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex.R.App.P. 37.3(b). Costs are assessed against appellant.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jul 27, 2006
No. 09-06-046 CV (Tex. App. Jul. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN R. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. JOE JACKSON, CONSTANCE HENSON AND PAUL…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jul 27, 2006

Citations

No. 09-06-046 CV (Tex. App. Jul. 27, 2006)