From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2011
No. C 11-4858 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-4858 SI (pr)

10-25-2011

GILBERTO LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General, Respondent.


ORDER OF TRANSFER

Gilberto Lopez Rodriguez has filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to challenge the legality of his custody by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"), pending his removal from the United States. He is incarcerated at Pinal County Adult Detention Center in Florence, Arizona.

The district of confinement is the proper venue for a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 447 (2004); Chatman-Bey v. Thornburgh, 864 F.2d 804, 813 (D.C. Cir. 1988); McCoy v. United States Bd. of Parole, 537 F.2d 962, 966 (8th Cir. 1976). Here, petitioner is in custody in the District of Arizona. The District of Arizona is the proper venue for his § 2241 petition, and the Northern District of California is not the proper venue. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The clerk shall transfer this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2011
No. C 11-4858 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:GILBERTO LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-4858 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)

Citing Cases

Dorrielan v. Warden

Hernandez v. Campbell, 204 F.3d 861, 865 (9th Cir. 2000); see Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 447 (2004);…