From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Goldey

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Jan 20, 2023
No. CIV-22-921-J (W.D. Okla. Jan. 20, 2023)

Opinion

CIV-22-921-J

01-20-2023

JEREMIAH RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN GOLDEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

BERNARD M. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner appearing pro se, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for initial proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636. [Doc. No. 3]. On December 22, 2022, Judge Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to pay the required filing fee and/or comply with the Court's orders. [Doc. No. 8]. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by January 11, 2023. No objection has been filed. Plaintiff has therefore waived any right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues in the Report and Recommendation. See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 8] and DISMISSES this case without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to pay the required filing fee and/or comply with the Court's orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Goldey

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Jan 20, 2023
No. CIV-22-921-J (W.D. Okla. Jan. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Goldey

Case Details

Full title:JEREMIAH RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN GOLDEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 20, 2023

Citations

No. CIV-22-921-J (W.D. Okla. Jan. 20, 2023)