From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 13, 2011
80 A.D.3d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 508848.

January 13, 2011.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J.), entered January 20, 2010 in Sullivan County, which converted an application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, into a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and dismissed the petition.

Marcelo Rodriguez, Albion, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Peters, J.P., Rose, Malone Jr., Stein and Garry, JJ.


In 1976, petitioner was convicted of four counts of murder in the second degree as well as one count of robbery in the first degree and was sentenced to an aggregate prison term of 25 years to life. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules after he received mail at the correctional facility pertaining to two class action lawsuits. He brought an application for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the disciplinary determination. Supreme Court converted the application into a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and dismissed the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Petitioner appeals.

We affirm. The record discloses that petitioner brought the application for a writ of habeas corpus after the disciplinary determination was rendered, but before the administrative appeal of that determination had been completed. In fact, after petitioner filed his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a decision was made on the administrative appeal which reduced the penalty. Clearly, petitioner failed to fully exhaust his administrative remedies prior to bringing a legal proceeding to challenge the disciplinary determination ( see Matter of West v McGinnis, 4 AD3d 654, 655; Matter ofWatkins v Annucci, 305 AD2d 889, 890). Consequently, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition. Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and are lacking in merit.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 13, 2011
80 A.D.3d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARCELO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 13, 2011

Citations

80 A.D.3d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 123
913 N.Y.S.2d 923

Citing Cases

Turner v. Annucci

Moreover, petitioner has not demonstrated any prejudice due to the delay (see Watergate II Apts. v. Buffalo…